Baptism
The verb “baptize” and the noun “baptism” are Greek words that are not
translated but transliterated. We know the etymology because of the use of the
word in ancient Greek literature. They are words which have come down to us
through three different Greek languages over a period of 1000 years. Before
these words got into the New Testament they were a thousand years old. So we
know exactly what they mean. The Greek word for baptize means to identify one
thing with another, to identify with “something else.”
Homer, in the IX book of The
Odyssey, used the word baptize in his analogy of the spear entering the eye of
the Cyclops and with the immersing of hot steel in water by the smith: the
steel was identified with the water.
Herodotus used the word baptize in
baptizing a new spear in the blood of a pig which had been sacrificed to the
god of war: the spear was identified with its intent, to draw blood. When the
Spartans went to war they always took an oath to kill the enemy and in doing so
they plunged it into the pig’s blood. That was called the baptism of the spear.
It was now a warrior’s spear, it had touched blood. So the point of the spear,
which is something, goes into something else (pig’s blood) which has been
offered as a sacrifice to the god of war.
Euripides used baptize in
identifying a sunken ship with the sea. The “something else” was the bottom of
the sea. He said the ship was baptized in the sea. Thus, the connotation of the
word is always identification with “something else” and that is what baptizo
means. It means to put something into something else, and that is all.
We know this because there are seven
baptisms found in the Bible. Four of them are dry and three of them are wet,
but in each of these baptisms something or someone is identified with something
else. That is what baptizo really means. “Baptize” is not an English word, and
the only way to translate it is give it it’s proper meaning: to identify, to
identify something with something else.
To summarise: Baptizo or baptise means to identify. That is the translation of
the noun and “to identify” is the verb. This was true in the days of Homer.
Homer used these words in the sense of identification. Then in the days of the
great Greek historians of the fifth century BC, Herodotus and Thucydides used
it. Euripides used it. And always with great consistency the verb and the nouns
have meant identification. They connote identification. Something is identified
with something else. Homer talks about the crafty Ulysses putting the sharpened
beam into the eye of Cyclops. he says the plunging of the beam made a hissing
noise like a man who smelt iron when he dips the iron into the water, and he
used the word bapto, identifies it,
so that the iron is tempered. So the word has been used extensively so there
was never any excuse for a transliteration. The translation should be
“identification.”
Baptism
#2
Baptize
means to identify: To be made one with. It means something so identified with
something else that its nature or character is changed, or represents a real
change that has already taken place.
There are seven baptisms in the
scriptures (Four real, three ritual)
1. Real Baptisms: (Actual
Identification)
a) Baptism of Moses — 1
Corinthians 10:1,2. The children of Israel are identified with Moses and the
cloud as they pass through the Red Sea.
b) Baptism of the cross
or cup — Matthew 20:22; 2 Corinthians 5:21. Jesus Christ drank the cup filled
with our sins — identified with our sin and bore it on the cross. He was made
sin for us — 1 Peter 2:24.
c) Baptism of the Holy
Spirit — (Believer), 1 Corinthians 12:13. The believer at the point of
salvation is placed into the body of Christ. He is identified then as a
believer, as a Christian — Acts 1:5; Romans 6:3,4; Galatians 3; Colossians
2:12, Ephesians 4:5.
d) Baptism of fire —
(Unbelievers), the baptism of judgement on all believers: Battle of Armageddon,
Matthew 25:31, 33; 3:11; Luke 3:16; 2 Thessalonians 1:7-9.
2. Ritual Baptisms: (Representative
Identification) Water is used. Water is symbolic of something else, but the
individual is really identified with the water.
a) Baptism of John —
Matthew 3:6, 11a. Water is symbolic of the Kingdom of God which John preached.
People, when baptized by John were indicating, in effect: “I have previously
believed in Christ, I am now symbolising that identification with His Kingdom
by baptism.”
b) Baptism of Jesus.
Unique Baptism. Water was used. Jesus Christ was NOT a sinner. Water is
symbolic of the Father’s will. Jesus Christ identified Himself with the
Father’s will in the execution of salvation — Matthew 3:13-17. We cannot
“follow the Lord in baptism” as to His purpose (securing our redemption) but
can duplicate the mode of His baptism.
c) Baptism of the
believer in the Church Age — Matthew 28:9. Water represents the person of the
Lord Jesus Christ. Believers are identified with Christ in His death, burial,
and resurrection. It symbolises retroactive and current positional truth. It is
the ritual of the real baptism of the Holy Spirit. It is thus a picture of
Spirit baptism.
The person going into the water is
identified with the water, and he is saying in effect, “I am identified with
Him in His death.”
The person coming out of the water
is identified with the air which represents: Identification with Christ in His
resurrection; The believer giving testimony to current positional truth —
allowing His resurrection life to live through us.
Ritual without reality is
meaningless. Water baptism is the ritual (picture) of the real (Baptism of the
Holy Spirit). The believer needs doctrine before baptism, i.e. positional
truth: retroactive positional truth , current positional truth, experiential
positional truth, human good versus divine good. He should understand the
difference between relationship and fellowship.
The believer was baptized in the
early church very soon after salvation. Reason: Because as soon as the
individual was saved he was given a long lesson in Bible doctrine. Immediately
upon understanding the basics the individual was baptized. An individual should
never be baptized until he understands the doctrine behind the ritual.
____________________________
Baptism
The verb “baptize” and the noun “baptism” are Greek words that are not
translated but transliterated. We know the etymology because of the use of the
word in ancient Greek literature. They are words which have come down to us
through three different Greek languages over a period of 1000 years. Before
these words got into the New Testament they were a thousand years old. So we
know exactly what they mean. The Greek word for baptize means to identify one
thing with another, to identify with “something else.”
Homer, in the IX book of The Odyssey, used the word baptize in his analogy of the spear
entering the eye of the Cyclops and with the immersing of hot steel in water by
the smith: the steel was identified with the water.
Herodotus used the word baptize in
baptizing a new spear in the blood of a pig which had been sacrificed to the
god of war: the spear was identified with its intent, to draw blood. When the
Spartans went to war they always took an oath to kill the enemy and in doing so
they plunged it into the pig’s blood. That was called the baptism of the spear.
It was now a warrior’s spear, it had touched blood. So the point of the spear,
which is something, goes into something else (pig’s blood) which has been
offered as a sacrifice to the god of war.
Euripides used baptize in
identifying a sunken ship with the sea. The “something else” was the bottom of
the sea. He said the ship was baptized in the sea. Thus, the connotation of the
word is always identification with “something else” and that is what baptizo
means. It means to put something into something else, and that is all.
We know this because there are seven
baptisms found in the Bible. Four of them are dry and three of them are wet,
but in each of these baptisms something or someone is identified with something
else. That is what baptizo really means. “Baptize” is not an English word, and
the only way to translate it is give it it’s proper meaning: to identify, to
identify something with something else.
To summarise: Baptizo or baptise means to identify. That is the translation of
the noun and “to identify” is the verb. This was true in the days of Homer.
Homer used these words in the sense of identification. Then in the days of the
great Greek historians of the fifth century BC, Herodotus and Thucydides
used it. Euripides used it. And always with great consistency the verb and the
nouns have meant identification. They connote identification. Something is
identified with something else. Homer talks about the crafty Ulysses putting
the sharpened beam into the eye of Cyclops. he says the plunging of the beam
made a hissing noise like a man who smelt iron when he dips the iron into the
water, and he used the word bapto,
identifies it, so that the iron is tempered. So the word has been used
extensively so there was never any excuse for a transliteration. The
translation should be “identification.”
Baptize means to identify: To be
made one with. It means something so identified with something else that its
nature or character is changed, or represents a real change that has already
taken place.
There are seven baptisms in the
scriptures (Four real, three ritual)
1. Real Baptisms: (Actual
Identification)
a) Baptism of Moses — 1
Corinthians 10:1,2. The children of Israel are identified with Moses and the
cloud as they pass through the Red Sea.
b) Baptism of the cross
or cup — Matthew 20:22; 2 Corinthians 5:21. Jesus Christ drank the cup filled
with our sins — identified with our sin and bore it on the cross. He was made
sin for us — 1 Peter 2:24.
c) Baptism of the Holy
Spirit — (Believer), 1 Corinthians 12:13. The believer at the point of salvation
is placed into the body of Christ. He is identified then as a believer, as a
Christian — Acts 1:5; Romans 6:3,4; Galatians 3; Colossians 2:12, Ephesians
4:5.
d) Baptism of fire —
(Unbelievers), the baptism of judgement on all believers: Battle of Armageddon,
Matthew 25:31, 33; 3:11; Luke 3:16; 2 Thessalonians 1:7-9.
2. Ritual Baptisms: (Representative
Identification) Water is used. Water is symbolic of something else, but the
individual is really identified with the water.
a) Baptism of John — Matthew
3:6, 11a. Water is symbolic of the Kingdom of God which John preached. People,
when baptized by John were indicating, in effect: “I have previously believed
in Christ, I am now symbolising that identification with His Kingdom by
baptism.”
b) Baptism of Jesus.
Unique Baptism. Water was used. Jesus Christ was NOT a
sinner. Water is symbolic of the Father’s will. Jesus Christ identified Himself
with the Father’s will in the execution of salvation — Matthew 3:13-17. We
cannot “follow the Lord in baptism” as to His purpose (securing our redemption)
but can duplicate the mode of His baptism.
c) Baptism of the
believer in the Church Age — Matthew 28:9. Water represents the person of the
Lord Jesus Christ. Believers are identified with Christ in His death, burial,
and resurrection. It symbolises retroactive and current positional truth. It is
the ritual of the real baptism of the Holy Spirit. It is thus a picture of
Spirit baptism.
The person going into the water is
identified with the water, and he is saying in effect, “I am identified with
Him in His death.”
The person coming out of the water
is identified with the air which represents: Identification with Christ in His
resurrection; The believer giving testimony to current positional truth —
allowing His resurrection life to live through us.
Ritual without reality is
meaningless. Water baptism is the ritual (picture) of the real (Baptism of the
Holy Spirit). The believer needs doctrine before baptism, i.e. positional
truth: retroactive positional truth , current positional truth, experiential
positional truth, human good versus divine good. He should understand the
difference between relationship and fellowship.
The believer was baptized in the
early church very soon after salvation. Reason: Because as soon as the
individual was saved he was given a long lesson in Bible doctrine. Immediately
upon understanding the basics the individual was baptized. An individual should
never be baptized until he understands the doctrine behind the ritual.
Baptism
of the Cross
The first use of the word “cup” is
in Matthew 26:39 (The Cross). The cup contained the sins of the world. Jesus
Christ was sinless — 2 Corinthians 5:21. The Father judged those sons — Isaiah
53:4-6.
Christ drank from the cup — John
18:11. Drinking from the cup is a picture of the judgement of God’s wrath.
which fell upon the Son when He drank (when He bore the sins of the world).
God’s wrath is against sin but the sins were poured out upon Christ who drank
the cup to the bottom (bore the sins of the whole world), therefore the
Father’s wrath was poured out upon Him.
The Father rejected human good for
future judgement. The individual chooses human good for divine good (the
cross). The work of Christ on the cross was divine good. If one rejects divine
good (Christ’s work) they stand on their own merit (human good). Anyone
standing on human good will have a cup from which he will drink, containing the
wrath of God.
Jesus Christ deliberately drank from
the cup: volition of His humanity. He received the judgement for our sins.
The alternative: Either accept
Christ drinking the cup for you on the cross, or accept the wrath of God on
yourself. If you reject the cross, then the alternative is the wrath of God.
In the Tribulation Jesus Christ
becomes the judge and He pours out His vials (drinking cups) of judgement on
religious unbelievers — Revelation 16.
When He came, first advent: He drank
the cup.
When He comes, second advent:
Unbelievers will drink the cup because they did not accept His drinking cup for
them.
Baptism
of the Holy Spirit
The baptism of the Holy Spirit did
not occur in the Old Testament or in any previous dispensation — Acts 1:5,
future tense. The baptism of the Holy Spirit was prophesied by John the Baptist
— Matthew 3:11; Mark 1:8; Luke 3:16. The mechanics for the baptism of the Holy
Spirit is given in 1 Corinthians 12:13. The Holy Spirit enters the believer
into union with Christ at the moment of salvation. It happened the first time
on the Day of Pentecost.
The unification of believers is
dependent upon the baptism of the Holy Spirit (this only occurs at the moment
of salvation). The implication of the baptism H/S are given in Galatians
3:26-28. Principle: All social distinctions are destroyed. The principle of
retroactive identification is brought out in Romans 6:3-4; Colossians 2:12.
The baptism of the Holy Spirit
begins the Church Age — Compare: Matthew 16:18 (Says the Church is future);
Acts 1:5; 2:3. Key verses: Acts 11:15-17 — says the baptism of the Holy Spirit
took place on the Day of Pentecost. 1 Corinthians 12:13, “one body”: the body
of Christ, Colossians 1:18.
The baptism of the Holy Spirit is
the basis for positional truth — Ephesians 1:3-6. It is not an experience, it
is NOT speaking in tongues or ecstatics. The aorist tense
of 1 Corinthians 12:13, once and for all, plus the phrase “we all” (all who
believe), not just some.
Colossians
2:12
— we are actually looking at the ritual related to this spiritual
circumcision. “Buried” is the aorist passive participle from the compound verb sunqaptw. Sun means “with,” qaptw means to be buried. It should be translated “Having
been buried with.” It is an aorist tense: point of salvation. Passive voice:
you received this burial, you didn’t bury yourself.
“with him” — we have the locative of
a)utoj, a pronoun used here for
Jesus Christ. It is in the locative form to indicate union with Christ —
“Having been buried with him” or “in him.” This is the positional truth of
Romans 6.
Then we have a prepositional phrase,
the preposition e)n plus the instrumental of baptisma. Baptisma is in the instrumental case
— “Having been buried in him by means of the baptism.” There is a definite
article here.
We have to remember that baptisma which is a noun, baptizw which is a verb, and baptw which is a verb, are all
words which have come down to us through three different Greek languages over a
period of 1000 years. Before these words got into the New Testament they were a
thousand years old. So we know exactly what they mean. The worst thing that
ever happened to the Christian church in the English speaking world is when
these words were transliterated. For example, baptizw is transliterated “baptise.” But it isn’t a translation. Only a
translation tells us what is going on. It is legitimate only to transliterate
the proper names of people and geographical locations, and so on — rivers,
mountains, cities; but it is never legitimate to transliterate a verb like baptizw. It should be translated. That has not been done and
that is a part of the great problem. Baptizw or baptise means to
identify. That is the translation of the noun and “to identify” is the verb.
This was true in the days of Homer. Homer used these words in the sense of
identification. Then in the days of the great Greek historians of the fifth
century BC, Herodotus and Thucydides used it. Euripides
used it. And always with great consistency the verb and the nouns have meant
identification. They connote identification. Something is identified with
something else. Homer talks about the crafty Ulysses putting the sharpened beam
into the eye of Cyclops. he says the plunging of the beam made a hissing noise
like a man who smelt iron when he dips the iron into the water, and he used the
word baptw, identifies it, so that the
iron is tempered. So the word has been used extensively so there was never any
excuse for a transliteration. The translation should be identification.
Baptisms
by
Dr. George E. Meisinger
Chafer Theological Seminary
cts@school.com
When one hears the
word "baptism," it is natural to assume water baptism. In many
people’s minds water and baptism are inseparable.
The word
"baptism" comes from the Greek word baptizo. In the fourth century B.C., Aristophanes used the term of
dipping or plunging a cup into a bowl of wine to draw out the wine.[1]
Polybius in the second
century B.C., used baptizo to
describe a sunken ship, obviously immersed.[2]
The Septuagint (the
Greek translation of the Old Testament) uses the term to describe a Syrian
general, Naaman, who plunged himself (baptizo)
seven times into the Jordan River (2 Kings 5:14). In these three instances,
whatever or whoever was "baptized" was immersed.
The term, however, was
also used metaphorically without involving water. For example, in a papyrus
dated about 150 B.C., the individual "baptized" was overwhelmed or
flooded, not by water, but by calamities.[3]
To be baptized in the
ancient world, then, was to be engulfed by something, whether wine, water or
trouble. The term emphasizes the notion of "submerge," or
"immerse."
If we ask what meaning
"baptism" has, we find help in an ancient custom that employed the
term baptizo. Before going to war,
Spartan soldiers took their spears and swords and plunged (baptized) them in
blood.
The Egyptians had a
custom when a crocodile dragged a person into the Nile and drowned him. When
his body was recovered, the priests embalmed the remains, arrayed it in
beautiful robes and placed it in a sacred sarcophagus. They treated his body
"'as one who is more than an ordinary being.' A man drowned in this way
was called one who had been 'immersed' [baptized]."[4]
What do we learn from
the Spartan and Egyptian usages of the term? The Spartan's immersion was to
identify their weapons with their intended purpose, which for them was warfare.
A similar situation exists for the Christian. His baptism publicly identifies
him with God's purpose for his life, which for them is to glorify God (1
Corinthians 10:31).
The Egyptians believed
that the immersion of the drowned man identified him with special status. He
was no longer ordinary, but extraordinary. So it is with Christians. Their
baptism identifies them with their new extraordinary place in the plan of God:
they are sons of God, royal priests, and raised to newness of life.
It is likewise with the various New Testament
baptisms: Each act of baptism identifies the individual with something
suggested by its context.
Of the eight baptisms
that follow, the first five involve no water, that is, no one got wet. The
final three baptisms involve water. Yet in all cases the baptisms identified
those baptized with something.[5]
In this passage the
apostle speaks of Israel (“our fathers”), all of whom were baptized unto Moses,
the Pillar of Cloud and the sea. Because Moses was God's appointed leader, by
baptism unto Moses they were identified with Moses and God’s purpose for Israel
through Moses. The cloud spoke of the Lord and divine guidance. The sea, which
God parted, spoke of divine omnipotence. Thus, the baptism of Israel identified
the Jews with God's omnipotent plan for Israel, under Moses, between the Exodus
and entrance into Canaan. By the way, no Israelite got wet!
The "cup"
refers to Jesus Christ's suffering on the cross for the sins of the world.
Jesus Christ identified with our sins in that God "made Him who knew no sin to be [a sin-bearer] for us, that we
might become the righteousness of God in Him" (2 Corinthians 5:21; cp.
1 Peter 2:24). Being our sin-bearer, Christ was immersed in our sin and died,
paying the penalty for our sin and guilt. He drank the cup of our suffering for
us. We could also call this the baptism of the Cross.
This fire speaks of
divine judgment that destroys the chaff (unbelievers) in Israel. These
unbelievers will be identified or immersed with fire or divine judgment at
Christ's second coming. God removes them from the earth at that time (Matthew
24:37-41; cp. 25:31-46). Three parables deal with the baptism of fire: (a) The
wheat and the tares (Matthew 13:24-30), (b) the good and bad fish (Matthew 13:47-51),
and (c) the wise and foolish virgins (Matthew 25:1-13).
In this baptism, which
takes place for every believer at the moment of faith in Christ, the Holy
Spirit identifies each Christian with the body of Christ (1 Corinthians
12:13; Galatians 3:26-28; Colossians 1:18; 2:12). This identification makes
each one a "new creation"
in Christ (2 Corinthians 5:17), thus granting him a new, perfect, and eternally
right relationship with God.
Noah's ark speaks of
how the baptism of the Spirit perfectly delivers a believer from judgment.
Peter shows that Noah's experience of full deliverance in the ark was a type of
the baptism of the Spirit. The ark speaks of God's perfect provision for all
who place their trust in Jesus Christ. Noah was a believer and, therefore,
placed in the ark, identified with it, and thus delivered from the judgment of
the flood. The believer who trusts Jesus Christ is placed in the ark of
positional truth and, consequently, delivered forever from eternal judgment.
This is the first of
the three baptisms that involve water. John immersed believers in water. The
water spoke of their faith in John's message concerning the coming Messiah and
of their repentance from sin because they were now in the kingdom of the
regenerate. After Pentecost (Acts 2), John's baptism was inadequate because it
was limited to the time of Christ's earthly ministry. For that reason, Paul
later rebaptized John's disciples to identify them with the new Church Age and
its distinctives (Acts 18:25-26; 19:3).
John the Baptist
immersed Jesus Christ in water. The water spoke of God the Father's will for
His Son. By His baptism, Christ testified to His willingness to fulfill God's
will for His life. This was a unique, never to be repeated baptism.
Immersion in water
symbolizes, or gives testimony to, a Christian’s immersion into union with
Christ by the Holy Spirit. This further identifies us with Christ's death and
resurrected life (cp. Romans 6:1-14). What believers' baptism portrays is a
deduction derived from details of the baptism of the Spirit. More follows in a
moment.
Chart number one in
the appendix compares and contrasts these eight baptisms.
There was a time when
baptism was a great troubling issue in the church. For example, after the
Reformation, there was a group of believers called the Anabaptists who believed
that one should only baptize people after
they had become Christians. Thus if one had been baptized before trusting Christ
as his Savior, they baptized him again after he became a Christian.
That is why people
called them Anabaptists: ana means "again." There were
many who took exception to that! They believed that if they had baptized
someone before his salvation, it was sufficient. They believed it so strongly
that widespread hostility broke out against the Anabaptists and many were
martyred for their convictions:
·
The Protestants
burned some at the stake.
·
The Roman Catholics
drowned those they caught.[6]
In later centuries
heated conflicts broke out among some believers about whether one should be
baptized by sprinkling, pouring, or immersion. Most denominations believe that
immersion is acceptable, but some also think that you may merely pour or
sprinkle water on the person being baptized. One thing remains clear, however,
in spite of all of the fuss that people have generated over the centuries, the
New Testament commands baptism.
In keeping with our
study under #8 above, when a Christian is baptized in water, he testifies to
his identification with Christ. God baptizes the believer by the agency of the
Holy Spirit into union with Christ (1 Corinthians 12:13), thus making him
a part of the body of Christ, the Church (Colossians 1:18). In this way the believer
is identified or associated with the Head of the body, Christ Himself, and with
the rest of the body, his fellow believers.
To develop the
symbolism of water baptism further, we may say that as a believer is immersed
in water, he signifies his identification with Christ's death on the Cross and
how that washed away his sins through faith in Christ (Colossians 2:12, 20;
3:3; cp. Acts 22:16; 1 Corinthians 6:11; Revelation 7:14). As he comes up out
of the water, he signifies his identification with Christ's resurrected life
and how he may now walk in "newness of life" (Romans 6:3-4;
Colossians 2:12; 3:1).
There are at least
four reasons why we must answer this question "No!"
Salvation is by grace
through faith alone in Christ alone. Thus, baptism does not save anyone, or
help to save anyone. Man can do nothing by way of good works to acquire or
maintain eternal life (Romans 4:4-5; 11:6; Ephesians 2:8-9; Titus 3:5).
1.
Acts 8:12-13. "When they believed [i.e., 'after' they
believed] . . . they were baptized." The sequence is first faith,
which saved, then water baptism.
2.
Acts 10:44-48. The
sequence is clear: Peter preached, the Holy Spirit fell on those who heard the
word (and believed) "then
Peter answered . . . and ordered them to be baptized in the name of Jesus
Christ." Note that he ordered or commanded, thus did not make water
baptism optional for those who had believed.
3.
Acts 9:17-18;
22:6-16, esp. 16. The sequence of events is (a) Paul was born-again in Damascus
following a challenge from Ananias (Acts 22:16), (b) the Holy Spirit then
filled him (Acts 9:17), and (c) finally Ananias baptized Paul with water (Acts
9:18; 22:16).
4.
Romans 4:1-4,
10-11. This passage gives us an extraordinary illustration of how ritual follows inner spiritual reality. Abraham
first believed then God imputed righteousness to Abraham while he was still
uncircumcised. Then he was circumcised. In fact, the Lord did not have Abraham
circumcised until 25 years after he was declared righteous (cp. Hebrews 11:8;
Acts 7:2-4 and Genesis 12:1-3 with 17:9-19).
The Didache (ca. A.D. 150)[7] does not allow for baptism until the reality
precedes the ritual. It claims that "instruction precedes baptism."[8]
Josephus, a first
century historian, states "that the washing (with water) . . . [was] not
in order to the putting away of some sins . . . [but presupposed] that the soul
was thoroughly purified beforehand by righteousness."[9]
What about those too
sick to baptize? Or a dying man who believes on the street following a fatal
car accident? What about the repentant thief on the cross next to Christ who
put his faith in Him (Luke 23:29-43)? Also Scripture declares Zaccheus (Luke 19:9)
and Cornelius (Acts 10:7) to be saved before they were baptized.
It does not contribute
to our salvation. God gives each new convert at least 33 things at the moment
of salvation that place him in perfect and eternal relationship to God (Hebrews
10:14). One cannot improve upon such perfection with or without water.
It does not make one
more spiritual. A Christian achieves spiritual status only through walking by
means of the Holy Spirit and through growth in God's Word, not through water.
Water baptism has no
magic in it and imparts no mystical or spiritual potential. It confers no grace
to those who are baptized, that is, it does not guarantee to them heaven,
spiritual success, forgiveness, a greater potential to become saved at a later
age, nor secure the removal of sin, whether the sin nature, imputed sin, or
personal sin. Water baptism is a picture or symbol of an already existing inner
reality.
In a word,
"yes!" But why? John baptized Jesus Christ and we are to imitate
Christ to fulfill the standard of righteousness as He did (cp. Matthew 3:15).
Christ baptized others
through His disciples (John 3:22, 26; cp. 4:1-2), showing His approval. In the
Great Commission, the resurrected Christ commanded His followers to baptize
those they disciple, just days before the Church dispensation began (Matthew
28:19-20). In obedience to Christ's command, the apostles commanded the newly
converted to be baptized (Acts 2:38).
The New Testament
church practiced water baptism as an integral tradition of the present age
(Acts 19:4; 1 Corinthians 1:13-17). In 1 Corinthians 1:13-17 (cp. esp. 1:17
with 4:15) a clear-cut distinction is made between the Gospel and baptism. Paul
led all of them to Christ through the gospel, but only baptized the few
mentioned in chapter 1. He delegated the baptizing of the rest to his
evangelistic team members, e.g., Sosthenes and Timothy (1 Corinthians 1:1;
16:10).
The fact remains that
though he did not emphasize baptism, he did in fact baptize. It is one thing to
say that Paul did not emphasize baptism, but it is non sequitur to say that because he chose to delegate the ritual we
should not baptize. Paul did baptize some, and since he thought it important
enough to do that, we may assume he,
as Christ before Him, delegated the rest to others!
By the way, throughout
the centuries a baptism service has been a time of rejoicing, not a chore to be
endured, or to be gotten over as quickly as possible.
Let me illustrate a
positive attitude regarding baptism.[10] At a large church in Elkton, Maryland, a visitor
came to a Sunday morning service. During the message he listened with great
interest and at the conclusion of the service the preacher gave his usual
appeal for people to believe in Christ for eternal life and forgiveness. This
visitor showed that he wanted to believe in Christ.
The custom of that
church is to baptize new believers on the spot. Consequently -- and I quote the
preacher now -- "When he came into the baptistry, I dropped him into the
water and out again to walk in the newness of life. He came up out of the water
clapping his hands and shouting, `Hot dog, Hot dog, Hot dog.’
"Our people
roared with laughter. I quickly asked them for silence as I explained that this
. . . man had not been around the church and didn't know about ‘Amen, Praise
the Lord, and Hallelujah.’ His word was ‘Hot dog,’ and he was praising the Lord
with the only vocabulary he knew."
The point is that
baptism is not only necessary as a fulfillment of righteous living, but a time
of rejoicing as the new believer thus testifies to his faith in the Savior.
This expression of faith should also be a catalyst of joy to those observing.
Three ways of
baptizing exist in the Christian world today: sprinkling, pouring, and
immersion. Does the New Testament show that the first Christians followed one
or the other?
The primary usage of baptizo is to "immerse" or
"dip." There are other Greek words for pouring (ekxeo)[11] and dipping (bapto).[12]
The verb "to
baptize" is often used with prepositions (eis and en) whose primary
meanings are "into" and "in" that denote to immerse
completely.[13]
Circumstances
attending the administration of baptism further denote immersion. For example:
·
"Coming up out of the water" (Mark 1:9-10). We best explain this as coming up
out of the water that had immersed the new convert.
·
John baptized near
the city of Salim "because there was
much water there" (John 3:23). Other places also had much water, e.g.,
the Jordan River (Matthew 3:13, 16). The best way to explain the mention of “much” water is that more than a pitcher
full of water was used to accomplish baptism. Why? Immersion was practiced.
·
When Philip
baptized the Ethiopian eunuch, "they
both went down into the water." When done "they came up out of the water" (Acts 8:38-39). This,
again, we best explain by an immersion.
Immersion is the best
mode to picture our identification with Christ's death and resurrection (Romans
6). Going completely down into the water speaks of our death and burial with
Christ (Romans 6:3-4). Coming up out of the water speaks of our resurrection
with Christ unto newness of life (Romans 6:5b, 8, 11b).
Early church history:
The Didache allowed pouring but only
if no other means were available. It draws a clear distinction between pouring
(ekxeo) and immersion (baptizo). Historian Philip Schaff says
immersion was the original form,[14] and Martin Luther preferred it.[15] John Calvin says that immersion was the custom
of the ancient church, though he thought the mode inconsequential.[16]
Proselyte baptism and
John the Baptist's baptism were immersion. It does not make sense to claim that
the church practiced something different without sound evidence that they did.
Application: if you have not been baptized since believing in Christ, you
should be immersed. If, however, someone poured or sprinkled you after your new
birth, that is acceptable. Scripture does not command the mode, but does the
act! If one has a choice in the matter, though, it is best to follow the New
Testament pattern.
Baptism is for
Christians who have believed and want to bring forth fruit in keeping with
their repentance (deduction from Matthew 3:8). They also want to fulfill the
process of discipleship for their lives (Matthew 28:19) and accept Christ's
authority and thus are obedient (Acts 2:38).
Note that though Paul
did not emphasize baptism in his ministry, that is, he did not always do it
himself, yet he still did do it, or had others do it for him. And he did it as
late as the 5th decade of the first century in both Corinth and Ephesus (1
Corinthians 1 and Acts 19).
See Chart number two
in the appendix that provides an overview of the historical occurrences of
water baptism in the first century.
If we should baptize
only those who believe, what does this mean for "infant baptism?"[17] Many parents rightfully want the best for their
children, thus they have them baptized where this is practiced. Yet there are
at least 7 reasons for not baptizing infants and for parents to wait until a
later time:
1.
There is no
evidence in the New Testament of someone baptizing a baby. To do it, therefore,
is to practice it without biblical precedent or teaching.
2.
Sometimes appeal is
made to "household baptism" (whole families baptized) as a reason for
baptizing babies. This, however, is not valid because the texts show that those
baptized had believed, something a baby cannot yet do (Acts 11:14 & 17-18;
16:31-34; 1 Corinthians 1:16 cp. with 16:15).
3.
Others appeal to
the Lord's blessing of little children (Matthew 19:13-15), insisting those acts
justify baptizing infants. Yet blessing and baptizing are different. To bless
is to seek God's benefits for! To baptize is to perform a ritual that pictures an
already existing inner spiritual reality.
4.
Some people appeal
to 1 Corinthians 7:14, which says that children are "holy" or
"sanctified." Yet sanctification and baptism are two different
things. What the passage does say is that God regards the children of a mixed
marriage (believer + unbeliever) to be legitimate (as opposed to illicit).
5.
Some attempt to
create an analogy between circumcision and baptism, appealing to Colossians
2:11-13. This too cannot stand because:
·
Circumcision and
baptism are concerned with separate ages: Israel and the Church. For Israel
circumcision was a sign of their national relationship with the Lord. For the
church baptism is a sign of identification with Christ's death and life.
·
Circumcision and
baptism involve different covenants, that is, on the one hand, the Abrahamic
and Mosaic covenants and, on the other hand, the New Covenant. Under the Mosaic
Covenant the Lord commanded to circumcise 8 day old boys. Under the New
Covenant, we should baptize all who believe, whether old or young, male or
female (Acts 8:12).
·
God gave the sign
of circumcision only to Abraham's descendants, thus Jonah did not ask the
Assyrians to be circumcised. Nor did Elisha seek to circumcise Naaman, the
Syrian.
6.
There is an
implication in the Great Commission (Matthew 28:18-20). Here Christ commands
Christians to make disciples by baptizing and teaching converts. You cannot
"make disciples" of babies for they cannot be taught, thus it is
senseless to baptize them.
7.
Infant baptism is
expressly contradicted by several biblical truths:
·
By the Scripture's
prerequisite of faith.
·
By symbolism, i.e.,
you would not bury one physically before his death, so similarly you should not
bury one symbolically in baptism before his identification with Christ's death.
·
By history: the Didache did not allow for infant baptism
for it claimed that "instruction precedes baptism." Historically, it
appears, infant baptism arose because of the erroneous teachings of
sacramentalism [that baptism confers a special or mystical grace] and baptismal
regeneration [that forgiveness requires water baptism].[18]
·
By attempts to
rationalize its existence. Many advocates claim that the power of infant
baptism is not tied to the exact moment of administration, but looks forward to
the child's later years. They sometimes say that baptism becomes effective when
the child's "dawning" intelligence awakens to what took place. The
Bible does not claim that any type of power exists in water baptism itself.
Furthermore, the Bible portrays baptism as taking place after the "dawned
intelligence" has believed in the Lord Jesus Christ.
8.
The insurmountable
problems of infant baptism
·
It is a subtle
deception for it promotes a false security about salvation. It blurs the fact
that the only means of salvation is faith alone in Christ alone. Thus, it works
against one's voluntary act of faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.
·
It warps sound
theology because infant baptism minimizes the complete sufficiency of faith in
God's promises to effect salvation (cp. 1 Peter 1:23).
·
Infant baptism
promotes a type of legalism because some groups that practice it exclude the
infants of parents whose faith is nominal or insincere. Church leaders then may
arrogate to themselves the ability to discern how sincere parents are, or to
fathom their motivation--something only God can do (1 Corinthians 4:5).
·
Though infant
baptism is not directly prohibited in
the New Testament, it is better to carry out baptism as Scripture shows. Follow
the Word; do not invent something not there.
·
One should not
employ infant baptism for "infant dedication" because (1) it has no
precedent in the Word, and (2) it adds a different and biblically foreign
meaning to baptism.
Paul rebaptized a
group of John the Baptist's disciples, who were probably true believers (Acts
19:1-4). In fact, there is no reason to suppose that if they had died between
their conversion under John and before their baptism by Paul that they would
not have gone to heaven.
Prior to their
encounter with Paul, however, they had not been baptized by the Holy Spirit and
thus added to the Body of Christ, the Church (1 Corinthians 12:13; Colossians
1:18).
Paul’s concern in Acts
19 was that they receive the Spirit and thus be identified with Christ in his
death, burial and resurrection (cp. Roman 6:1-14). Then Paul’s water baptism
would take on a new meaning for them, matching their new inner reality and
position in Christ.
The implication is
that rebaptism should be done if it's a case of being rebaptized as a Church
Age believer. Of course, we are no longer in a transitional period such as
those in the book of Acts. So what is the principle? Since the baptism of the
Holy Spirit is a once-for-all-event, baptism should be done once-for-all after
you have been born again.
As the enthusiastic
convert who cried out "hot dog!" we should seek not only to
"fulfill all righteousness," but also to rejoice at a baptism
service. A baptism is foremost of all a symbol of one's new position in Jesus
Christ and how through faith the Spirit identifies him with Christ's death and
resurrection.
Chart One
|
||||
Name |
Type & Verse |
Baptizer |
Agency |
Identified With |
John |
Ritual (Mt. 3:11) |
John the Baptist |
Water |
Repentance |
Jesus |
Ritual (Mt. 3:13-17) |
John the Baptist |
Water |
Righteousness |
Believers |
Ritual (Mt. 28:19) |
A Believer |
Water |
Body of Christ |
Noah |
Real (1 Pet. 3:20f) |
Jesus Christ |
Ark |
Positional Truth |
Israel |
Real (1 Cor 10:1-2) |
God |
Cloud & Sea |
Moses |
Cup |
Real (Mt. 20:20-23) |
God |
Cross |
Sins of World |
Fire |
Real (Lk. 3:16-17) |
Jesus Christ |
Fire |
Judgment |
Spirit |
Real (1 Cor. 12:13) |
Jesus Christ |
Holy Spirit |
Body of Christ |
Chart Two
WATER BAPTISM AND THE
LORD'S SUPPER An Historical Occurrence
Overview |
||||||
LORD'S SUPPER |
Gospels Acts 2 |
|
Acts 20 1 Cor. 10-11 |
Love Feast in Jude 12 |
|
|
|
10 Days before
Pentecost Jesus says to baptize all nations (Mt. 28:16-20). |
|
Paul baptized in
Corinth (1 Cor. 1:13-17). Baptism in a
theological discussion (1 Cor. 15:29) |
Baptisms in the
plural (Heb. 6:2) |
John records the
baptizing efforts of Jesus & His disciples (Jn. 3:22-26; 4:1-2). |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
AD 30-40 |
AD 40-50 |
AD 50-60 |
AD 60-70 |
AD 70-100 |
|
|
Baptize "all who are afar off" (Acts
2:38-39, 41). Examples: * Samaritans (Acts
8:12-13, 16) * Ethiopian (Acts
8:36-38) * Cornelius (Acts
10:47-48) |
|
Lydia (Acts 16:14-15) Philippian jailer
(Acts 16:33) John's disciples
(Acts 19:5) Paul mentions his own
baptism (Acts 22:16) |
Book of Acts end ca.
AD 61. Paul dies AD 64, less
than 10 years after rebaptizing John's disciples. |
|
|
George E. Meisinger is dean of
Chafer Theological Seminary and teaches in the Old and New Testament
departments. He received a Th.M. in Old Testament Literature and Exegesis from
Dallas Theological Seminary, and a D.Min. in Biblical Studies from Western
Seminary. He also pastors Grace Church in Huntington Beach, California.
[1] Henry Liddell and Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, London: Oxford University Press, 1966; p. 305.
[2] Ibid.
[3] James Moulton and George Milligan, The Vocabulary of the Greek Testament, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1963; p. 102.
[4] Gerhard Kittel, Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1972; 1:533.
[5] Note Chart One in the appendix.
[6] Earle E. Cairns, Christianity Through the Centuries, Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1980; pp. 331-334. Also see Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, vol. 3, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980.
[7] Cairns, pp. 82-83.
[8] James Orr, editor, International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing, 1939), 1:385-401.
[9] Josephus, Antiquities,
18:5:2. He also says that "baptism
is acceptable to God when used, not for the purification of the soul, but for
sanctification of life, the soul being already cleansed by righteousness"
(Ant., 18, 117).
[10] Paul Lee Tan, Encyclopedia of 7700 Illustrations: Signs of the Times (Rockville, Maryland: Assurance Publishers, 1984), p. 681.
[11] Bauer, Gingrich and Danker (BGD), A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, p. 247, give “pour out” as the principle definition.
[12] See use of the term bäptw at 2 Kings 8:15; Luke 16:24; John 13:16; and Revelation 2:14; 19:13. Also see BGD, pp. 132-33.
[13] See Mark 1:5, 9; Matthew 3:11; John 1:26, 31, 33.
[14] Schaff 1:468.
[15] Schaff 8:78.
[16] John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, MCMLX), 4. 15. 19 (pg. 1320). Also see Schaff 8:587.
[17] Frederic Godet, Commentary on 1 Corinthians (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 1979), pp. 346-48.
[18] See Baker’s Dictionary of Theology, Everett F. Harrison, ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker Book house, 1960, pp. 83-89, for a series of articles titled “Baptism,” “Baptism, Believers’,” “Baptism, Infant,” “Baptism for the Dead,” and “Baptismal Regeneration.”