The new covenant to Israel
1. Where is it found
in scripture? Jeremiah 31:31:34. It is quoted in Hebrews 8:8-12. It is
mentioned in Galatians 4:4; Hebrews 10:15-18.
2. The new covenant to
Israel was designed to demonstrate to the Jews the fact that the first
covenant, the Mosaic law, was temporary and was to be replaced. The Mosaic law
was designed for the Age of Israel, from the time of Moses to the time of the
cross, resurrection, ascension and session. At this point we have the
interruption by the Church Age in which God calls out a royal family for the
Lord Jesus. Then the Age of Israel continues with the Tribulation and concludes
with the second advent. The new covenant for Israel was designed for the
Millennial reign of Jesus Christ as well as for eternity. But specifically,
then, the old covenant was designed for the age between Moses and Christ. The
new covenant is designed for the Millennium.
3. The new covenant to
Israel was designed to carry Israel in the Millennium. The old covenant was
designed to carry Israel in that part of the dispensation of Israel from Moses
to Christ.
4. The new covenant to
Israel was designed to authorise the form of worship and the priesthood of
Israel in the Millennium. The old covenant to Israel was designed to authorise
the form of worship and the priesthood to Israel between Moses and Christ.
5. The new Covenant to
Israel was designed for Israel during the Millennium only.
6. The new covenant
will not be fulfilled until Jesus Christ returns to the earth at the end of the
Tribulation.
7. In this sense the
new covenant is like the other unconditional covenants to Israel. There are
three: the Abrahamic, Palestinian, and Davidic. There are three unconditional
covenants that existed in the Old Testament: the Abrahamic — Abraham is
promised a nation forever; the Palestinian — the geographical location of that
nation; the Davidic — that the son of David would rule that nation forever.
Jesus Christ is the fulfilment of that. The new covenant is like these three in
that it is unconditional and will not be fulfilled until the Millennium.
8. The Mosaic law, or
the first covenant in context, is designed for the Age of Israel. The second
covenant, the new covenant to Israel, is designed for the dispensation of the
Millennium. Therefore, it must be clearly understood that the quotation of
Jeremiah 31:31-34 in Hebrew 8:8-12 is the new covenant to Israel to be
fulfilled in the Millennium and not the new covenant to the Church. It was
inevitable that the Levitical priesthood should be replaced by a change of
dispensation. The interruption of the dispensation nullified the Levitical
priesthood as it nullified the Mosaic law as the authorising agent.
The
doctrine of the new covenant to Israel
1. Definition:
a) A covenant is a disposition made by one party — God — in favour of
another party — mankind, specifically regenerate of Israel.
b) The Mosaic covenant, also called the old covenant, was a covenant of
shadow worship, shadow buildings, shadow priesthood, shadow offerings.
c) Therefore its function was legitimate in a shadow dispensation. The
shadow dispensation was that part of the Age of Israel from Moses to Christ.
d) The first advent of Christ and His saving work on the cross
abrogated, canceled, the old covenant and/or the Mosaic covenant.
e) A new covenant had to be established so a new covenant was
immediately established for the Church. The new covenant to the Church authorises
the royal family of God during the Church Age and sets up the modus operandi
for a universal priesthood among believers.
f) The new covenant to Israel recognises the fulfillment of the
unconditional covenants to Israel in the past and sets up a modus operandi for
Israel in the Millennium.
g) The new covenant to Israel is a legacy for the restored Israel of the
Millennial reign of Christ.
2. Scripture: Jeremiah 31:31-34,
quoted in Hebrews 8:8-12, in part in 10:15-17, and mentioned as a point of
doctrine in Galatians 4:4.
3. The new authorising agency in
Israel. The abrogation of the Mosaic law by the saving work of Christ on the
cross plus the strategic victory — death, burial, resurrection, ascension and
session — leaves Israel without authorisation for their Levitical priesthood.
Their license is revoked. Therefore the new covenant to Israel replaces the
Mosaic law and gives a new license to the Levitical priesthood — in the
Millennium, not before. The function of that priesthood in the Millennium is
described in great detail in Ezekiel chapters 40-48.
4. The new dispensation for Israel.
Israel will be restored at the second advent of Jesus Christ and Christ will
begin a Millennial reign of 1000 years. The new covenant to Israel is the authorising
agency for the restored Israel of the Millennium as well as the verification of
the fulfillment of the unconditional covenants which have never been fulfilled.
God keeps His word. And so the new dispensation of Israel is the fulfillment of
the unconditional covenants.
5. The basis for the new covenant to
Israel.
a) Neither the Hebrew noun berith
nor the Greek noun diaqhkh refer to a will or a
testament, so they are often mistranslated. The correct word is covenant. A
will or a testament depends upon the physical death of the testator; the
covenants we are studying depend upon the spiritual death of Christ. But a
covenant doesn’t depend on death at all, a covenant is a disposition of the
party of the first part in favour of the party of the second part. Death does
not have to be involved, it just so happens that in the two new covenants death
is involved - the spiritual death of Christ.
b) The new covenant to Israel goes into effect on the blood of Christ
and/or the spiritual death of Christ and/or the efficacious sacrifice:
redemption, reconciliation, propitiation.
c) Therefore the blood of Christ is the spiritual legacy for the royal
family of the Church Age and Israel in the Millennium.
d) The new covenant to Israel is valid because of the blood of Christ,
the efficacious death of Christ on the cross bearing our sins. It is valid
because Christ sits in the mercy seat.
e) The new covenant to Israel is a reality in contrast to the shadows of
the old or Mosaic covenant.
f) The new covenant functions in the Millennium when Christ reigns as
David’s greater son. Christ comes to the royal family as a high priest but He
comes to Israel a King. Therefore there will be a place in the Millennium for
the Levitical priesthood because Christ will reign over Israel as David’s
greater son.
g) The animal sacrifices in the Millennium (found in Ezekiel 40-48) are
no longer shadows but they represent a frame of reference memorial to Israel
concerning the saving work of Jesus Christ on the cross. Hebrews 9:15-17.
6. The new covenant and the
Tribulation. Immediately a question arises. What about the last seven years of
the Jewish Age? The cross, resurrection, ascension and session interrupts the
Jewish Age. There are still seven years to go. The Church Age is an age of
intercalation, an insertion. Then, when the Rapture of the Church occurs the
Jewish Age resumes — +7 years. But there is no priesthood in that seven years,
the old covenant has been abrogated. There is no old covenant in the
Tribulation and neither is there any new covenant. So that poses a question.
What is the relationship of the new covenant to Israel to the Tribulation.
a) The Lord Jesus Christ will not be reigning in the Tribulation. Satan
will still be the ruler of this world.
b) Therefore the new covenant to Israel will not be operative and for
those seven years of the Tribulation there will be neither the new covenant to
the Church nor the new covenant to Israel. That means that those seven years
historically are going to be the worst in all of history. The pressure is not
any greater on the believer. We live in the intensified stage of the angelic
conflict right now. But there is going to be suffering on the earth and
catastrophe on the earth such as never was in all of history. Why? Because in
the last seven years — in fact it is called the Tribulation for that reason —
the new covenant to the Church crowd are in heaven and the new covenant to
Israel crowd haven’t started yet. So you have seven years when neither of the
new covenants function. And so the Tribulation is the period between the two
new covenants. When Christ returns the new covenant to Israel will function on
the earth but the new covenant to the Church will function in heaven forever.
c) There will be a Tribulational temple but it is a place of apostasy
and reversionism and is not authorised by the old covenant nor the new covenant
to Israel. There is no authorisation for the temple constructed in Jerusalem in
the Tribulation. That is where the abomination of desolation will be set up but
it is not authorised by God nor by any covenant to God.
d) The new covenant to the Church will not be operative during the
Tribulation because the Church has been resurrected or Raptured.
e) Neither of the new covenants operate during the Tribulation.
f) Therefore God sets up a different type of spiritual function,
different from anything that ever happened in the past but in some ways similar
to the period of the Judges. He sets up one hundred and forty-four thousand
Jews as spiritual leaders throughout the earth. They are evangelists and
spiritual leaders.
7. Summary. The new covenant to
Israel is the authorising agent for the restored Israel of the Millennium. It
verifies the future of Israel and recognises that the unconditional covenants
will be fulfilled. God keeps His word. The new covenants to Israel replace the
Mosaic law for the function of Israel’s priesthood in the Millennium.
Jeremiah 31:31-34
Verse 31 — we begin with a
demonstrative pronoun, hineh, used as
an interjection, used to focus attention on the new covenant to Israel given at
a low point in Jewish history. The Jews were about to go out under the fifth
cycle of discipline, they had just about had it, and just at a time when they
were at the lowest point God, through Jeremiah, gives them this wonderful
prophecy about their future. “Behold, the days come.” People have a tendency to
talk about “the good old days” but here are the good future days. Jamim refers to the Millennial reign of
Christ — “Behold the days are coming,” not come — the qal active participle of bo means they are coming, they are
future from Jeremiah’s day, they are future from our day.
“when I will make” — the qal perfect
of karath which means to cut or
engrave, it comes to mean to cut a covenant or to make a covenant. It was so
used for cutting the throat of an animal and since covenants were verified by
blood - even the old covenant was verified by shadow blood, the new covenant to
Israel and the new covenant to the Church were verified by the blood of Christ
— so karath is used originally for
slaying an animal sacrifice, but it comes to mean making a covenant. In this
case it is used for making a new covenant. Notice the direction of it, it is
“to the house of Israel [northern kingdom] and with the house of Judah
[southern kingdom].”
Literally: “Behold, the days are
coming, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of
Israel, and with the house of Judah.” Nothing here about the Church, this is
the new covenant to Israel and it belongs to the Millennium.
Verse 32 — reference to the old
covenant. “Not like the covenant which I made with their fathers [Exodus
generation] in the day that I took them” — the hiphil infinitive of chazaq means that He had to pick them up
by the collar and haul them out of Egypt. In effect, this is what God did, it
is the hiphil infinitive, it is very strong; God caused them to be hoisted up
by their collars and hauled out of slavery — “in the day when I seized them by
the hand” — the verb connotes the grace of God. The Jews were suffering from give-up-itis
and God dragged them out of Egypt — “to bring them out” — the hiphil infinitive
of jatsa means He caused them to come
out — “to cause them to come out of the land of Egypt; which” — relative
pronoun, goes with the verb — “they broke, although I was an husband” — the qal
perfect of baal means lord but it
also means husband — “and yet I was their Lord” is what it means here — “saith
Jehovah.”
Literally, “Not like the covenant
which I made with their fathers in the day when I seized them by the hand to
cause them to come out of the land of Egypt, my covenant which they broke, and
yet I was their Lord, saith Jehovah.”
Notice several things here: The
failure of the Exodus generation illustrates the failure of the incarnation
generation. The Jews of the Exodus generation rejected the Mosaic law but the
Jews of the incarnation generation rejected Messiah who fulfilled the shadows
of the Mosaic law. Therefore the necessity for the second advent of Christ to regather
Israel from their dispersion of the fifth cycle. The abrogation of the old
covenant demands a new covenant because Israel has a future.
Verse 33 — “But this covenant” —
referring to the new covenant to Israel — “that I will make” — the qal
imperfect of karath indicating that
it has not been completed yet, not fulfilled yet — “with the house of Israel
[Notice: always to the Jews]: After those days [the Tribulation], saith the
Lord” — He is going to make this covenant after those days, and those days
refers to the Tribulation — “I will put” — the qal perfect of nathan means ‘I will give’ — “my law
[Torah: literally, my doctrine] into their inward parts” — be qir ban, a prepositional phrase which refers to the mentality,
the frontal lobes — it should be translated “I will give my doctrine into their
mentality/frontal lobes”.
“and write it” — we have kathab which means to engrave, to
engrave it in their hearts, and it refers to the function of GAP and learning Bible doctrine so that they cannot forget it. There is no
knowing God apart from doctrine; there is no loving God apart from knowing God.
And so when it says “I will give my doctrine into their frontal lobes and
engrave it in their right lobe, their heart, consequently I will be their God”
— we have the inferential waw; I will
be their God because they will have doctrine to understand me, to love me. They
will have the capacity to love me. God is not the God of all believers in the
sense of a wonderful relationship. You cannot love God until you know doctrine.
Literally: “But this is the covenant
which I will make with the house of Israel after those days [the Tribulation], saith
the Lord, I will give my doctrine into their thinking, and engrave it in their
right lobes, therefore I will be their God, and they shall be my people.” The
secret is doctrine in the frontal lobes.
Notice that each dispensation has
its own covenant. The dispensation of the Gentiles has the Noahic covenant, the
dispensation of Israel has the Mosaic covenant, the dispensation of the Church
has the new covenant to the Church, and the dispensation of the Millennium has
the new covenant to Israel. And note that in every dispensation divine blessing
is related to doctrine in the soul always, without exception. Doctrine residing
in the soul is the key to the believer’s relationship with God in phase two.
Doctrine in the soul through the function of GAP is
the means of achieving supergrace, it is the way that we follow our regimental
standard to the high ground of the supergrace life.
What is the content of the new
covenant to Israel which we have been studying in Jeremiah chapter thirty-one?
The new covenant to the Church has as its content the New Testament epistles,
the mystery doctrines of the royal family. What is the content of the doctrine
which Israel will understand and learn in those days of the new covenant to
Israel? It is a combination of Old Testament doctrines plus the principles that
are found in Ezekiel chapters 40 through 48, as well as everything pertaining
to the Millennium. The Millennial reign of the Lord Jesus Christ will be a
reality when this covenant is in function and therefore they will understand
completely the Millennial reign of Christ. To make sure that we understand,
then, the content of the new covenant it deals with all Millennial passages in
Isaiah, it deals with Ezekiel 40-48, it is described in the eschatological
passages of the Millennium and the Tribulation in the book of Revelation.
But let us summarise just exactly
when the new covenant to Israel will be fulfilled. The last dispensation is the
Age of the Millennium or the Age of Christ’s Reign. The Millennial reign of
Christ begins with the second advent. The first item on the agenda is the
completion of the Armageddon campaign, the destruction of the enemy, the
baptism of fire, the coronation of the Lord Jesus Christ, and followed by the
1000 years of His reign. At the end of that 1000 years Satan, who has been
incarcerated with all fallen angels at the beginning of the Millennium, will be
released and will lead in a Gog and Magog revolt against Christ and the reign
of Christ, demonstrating the fact once more that people cannot be satisfied
with perfect environment, the must have more than that. The environmentalist as
a philosopher is always saying that the solution to man’s is problems is to
improve his environment, whether it is his social environment or his natural
environment. But the Word of God says this is not enough, there must be a
relationship with God, and this comes through regeneration.